GreenBuild Blog
Sustainability Planning
This section deals with campus and corporate sustainability planning and programs
Tuesday, December 06, 2011
Marketing Sustainable Design Services - Three Keys to the Future
Many architects are asking me how to change their marketing approaches to sustainable design services, since green building experience and expertise no longer confers specific competitive advantage, even to those who have been doing green projects since 2000 or 2005 and who have lots of LEED certified projects to their credit.
This concern is a reminder that nothing stays static in this business. What do firms need to do to maintain their focus on sustainability, but gain more advantage from this form of branding? I think there are three key steps to take right now.
Raise the Stakes
Stop resting on your laurels and start reinvesting in building the sustainable brand. That means getting your people out to conferences as presenters, especially where the client base is likely to hear them. Commission white papers on key sustainable topics. Write articles and op-ed pieces for leading client-focused trade and professional journals. Publish a 60-to100-page hardbound book on each of your projects, as many leading European firms do, and get it in client’s hands. With some practice, this can be done well for $25,000 or less per book; for a $50 million project that brought $4 million gross revenues in the door, this amount can be budgeted easily and is a lot cheaper than continuing to spend tens of thousands each on the vain pursuit of endless projects against equally credentialed competitors.Narrow the Focus
One key tenet of professional services marketing strategy is that you can’t be everything to everyone. You need to be something really special to a few key clients. For example, a firm might be known for doing museums and libraries in higher education. Keep that focus but extend the geographic reach of your business. Take as examples how HOK Sport and Ellerbe Beckett dominated the sports arena business. After all, key decisions on such projects are often made by a handful of influential experts, as compared, say, with higher education classroom/office buildings or dormitories, with which large numbers of firms have experience and which are often subject to wider influences. With this narrowing of focus, you’ll find that it’s more possible to place your experts at the top of the field and to get them key speaking and presentation assignments. Library directors like to talk with library design experts, museum directors with museum experts, etc.Become Fully Engaged in the Conversation
Sustainable design is evolving quickly into categories such as the 2030 Challenge, Living Building Challenge, Zero Net Energy Projects, Regenerative Buildings, Max Green goals, etc., each of which has various categories of experts, thought leaders, along with new practices, technologies and systems. In the Living Building Challenge, for example, you’ll have to focus as much on sustainable design for the water cycle as for the energy cycle. This creates both opportunities and challenges inside the firm, but gives you new chances to reassert, reclaim and reinvent your sustainable design expertise. Each of these practice areas has passionate advocates, so find people in your firm who care about each of these issue areas and get them into the conversation. Use social media to follow, participate in and then influence the discussions that are taking place daily.
I’d love to hear your comments on how your firm is staying up with sustainable design, green building and high-performance projects. If you want advice on how to deal with these challenges, email me and we’ll set up a call to discuss how I might help you.
Sustainability Planning • Permalink
Tweet
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Centralized Solar Power Plants Threaten Environment in the West
The endangered desert pupfish in southern Nevada is the latest obstacle to the dream of filling the West with large solar power plants, says an article in today’s Wall St. Journal. Any project that uses water, such as is required for cooling concentrating solar power plants, is a non-starter in the dry desert Southwest. And the construction required for large PV power plants is likely also to damage desert ecosystems beyond repair. If you fly over the Mojave Desert, you can still see wagon tracks from 150 years ago. We should be focusing instead on decentralized solar power (rooftops) and conservation before we commit hundreds of billions to desert power plants. Alternatively, something I’ve advocated for years, is to use the Navy’s bombing ranges in southeast California for PV power plants, since there’s no longer any endangered species after 50 years of dumping bombs there. There’s more than enough land there to power the entire Southwest. (Of course, there is the issue of unexploded ordnance!)
Sustainability Planning • PermalinkTweet
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Will the Credit Crunch Deal a Body Blow to Renewable Energy Projects?
A December 5th story in the Phoenix Business Journal describes that plans are on hold for the 280 megawatt $1 billion Solana Generating Station, Arizona’s largest solar plant, as funding dries up for large scale utility generating plants of all fuel types. In addition to the difficulty of getting bank loans, equity funding has dried up as a lot of large Wall Street investment banks such as Lehman Brothers either went our of business or were absorbed by other entities, as Merrill Lynch was purchased by Bank of America. Ironically, this situation may force utilities to move from their current arms-length stance of just acting as power purchasers to becoming the owners and developers of such facilities, since state utility commissions are holding firm on their renewable portfolio standards requiring a certain amount of renewable power online by fixed dates. Even if the lending environment eases next year, credit is likely to be more expensive and with more stringent terms and conditions attached. There is also the problem with wind power generating stations that the current energy production tax credit expires at the end of 2009, so that without further Congressional authorization most projects are likely to be smaller than otherwise anticipated.
Sustainability Planning • PermalinkTweet
Monday, November 24, 2008
Location of Land-Intensive Renewable Power Sites Stirs Controversy
Fundamentally, solar and wind power plants are land-intensive. Simple equation: solar radiation intensity is about 1.3 kW per square meter at the earth’s surface. If you want 1000 MW, at 10 percent net conversion efficiency, you have to cover 7 million square meters, or 1,700 (net) to 2,500 (gross) acres (4 square miles) per power plant. Not a lot, but enough to get people pretty riled up. Quite a bit more land will be needed for support facilities and transmission lines, or perhaps for thermal power storage if we’re talking concentrating solar power. We’re going to have to learn to live with both points of view. That’s what politics is all about.
Sustainability Planning • PermalinkTweet
Page 1 of 3 pages 1 2 3 >
Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe via Email